Isn’t it interesting that we have all these ideas and labels and concepts about what mystical experiences might be; hypnogogic states (vs non hypnogogic states?), hypervigilance (vs plain old vigilance?), spiritual (vs non spiritual?), Consciousness (vs unconsciousness?) and of course detachment(vs attachment?).
I think trying to understand (a thought process, or many many many many thought processes) IT is just a way to hold on to what we thought was reality (our old dualistic ways of perception). ie: “I think therefore I am”.
Maybe it’s “I am, therefore I don’t need to think” , Maybe “I am, and thinking is just something that happens. or maybe Thinking is pretty useless at this point.
Maybe No One knows, or will certainly never intellectually figure it out.