Isn’t it interesting that we have all these ideas and labels and concepts about what mystical experiences might be; hypnogogic states (vs non hypnogogic states?), hypervigilance (vs plain old vigilance?), spiritual (vs non spiritual?), Consciousness (vs unconsciousness?) and of course detachment(vs attachment?).

I think trying to understand (a thought process, or many many many many thought processes) IT is just a way to hold on to what we thought was reality (our old dualistic ways of perception). ie: “I think therefore I am”.

Maybe it’s “I am, therefore I don’t need to think” , Maybe “I am, and thinking is just something that happens. or maybe Thinking is pretty useless at this point.

Maybe No One knows, or will certainly never intellectually figure it out.



Say something!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s